California Leaders, Advocates & Organizations Opposed to Prop 40

Governor Gavin Newsom, both candidates for governor, the California Teachers Association, the California Medical Association, Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California, California Professional Firefighters, NAACP California/Hawaii and Equality California are among the 120+ organizations and leaders urging Californians to Vote No on Prop 40.

Healthcare Organizations

  • Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California
    Jodi Hicks, President & CEO

    "[Prop 40]’s uncertain impacts on the state budget and lack of specificity on health care allocations will do more harm than good in the long term. In order to protect access to care for the millions of patients that safety net providers like Planned Parenthood serve, we have opposed this measure and urge our health care partners to do the same."

  • California Children’s Hospital Association
    Ann-Louise Kuhns, President & CEO

    "California’s children deserve a stable, sustainable health care system. The one-time tax proposed by Prop 40 doesn’t provide that stability. Worse, the measure jeopardizes existing revenue that children on Medi-Cal, including those with the most medically complex conditions, rely upon for their care."

  • United Domestic Workers / AFSCME Local 3930
    Astrid Zuniga, President

    "UDW does not support this measure for several reasons: Most importantly, the proposed measure does not fund the IHSS or child care programs specifically, which provides vital care services to almost one million seniors and people living with disabilities across the state and child care to over one million qualified families. Secondly, a one-time wealth tax does not create the sustainable funding stream that is required to fully fund vital care programs like IHSS and child care programs. For these reasons, we’re urging our members to vote no on Prop 40, because we know it’s possible to deliver a better funding plan for our communities."

  • California Medical Association
    Rene Bravo, MD, President

    "[Prop 40] is the wrong way to address the state's health care funding challenges and was developed without input from the physicians, hospitals, clinics, and other providers who care for Medi-Cal patients every day. [Prop 40] relies on an unstable revenue source, provides no clear accountability for how the money would be spent, and does not offer the long-term funding solution that patients and health care professionals need."

  • California Primary Care Association Advocates
    Francisco Silva, President & CEO

    "It’s unfathomable that proponents of [Prop 40] are claiming their efforts are intended to help Medi-Cal, while at the very same time they are advocating for policies that will decimate the very safety-net and workforce that Medi-Cal patients rely on. Proponents have a long history of promoting flawed and deceptive proposals that actually harm patients. This measure is no different."

  • California Hospital Association
    California Hospital Association

    "While access to health care in California is more precarious than ever, [Prop 40] is simply the wrong answer. This measure would only temporarily generate funding and threaten the overall health of California’s finances over the long term, further jeopardizing resources for life-saving health care services. California can’t afford this poorly designed tax measure."

  • California Dental Association

Democratic Organizations

  • San Francisco Democratic Party
  • Edwin M. Lee Asian Pacific Democratic Club
  • San Francisco Eastern Neighborhoods Democratic Club
  • United Democratic Club of San Francisco

Housing Advocates

  • California Council for Affordable Housing
    Jenna Abbott, Executive Director

    "At a time when the state faces a severe housing shortage, policymakers should focus on attracting the resources needed to build affordable homes—not discouraging them. If our goal is to create and preserve affordable homes for working families, seniors, veterans, and people with disabilities, we should be encouraging investment in housing and community development—not creating new barriers that make it harder to finance the affordable housing Californians desperately need."

  • Housing California
    Chione Lucina Muñoz Flegal, Executive Director

    "To truly address our affordability crisis, California needs permanent, scaled investments that deliver stable, lasting impact. This measure simply doesn’t achieve that. That’s why Housing California and our partners remain focused on meaningful solutions that advance both health and prosperity: safe and affordable housing, strong schools, quality healthcare, and essential services. The foundation that will make everyday life more affordable and ensure our communities thrive."

  • Housing Action Coalition
    Corey Smith, Executive Director

    "[Prop 40] puts at risk the very programs California depends on to build housing. From affordable housing funding and financial incentives for builders, to the state agency staffing that reviews entitlements and holds local governments accountable to their housing goals, these are the building blocks of housing production. Stable, sustained investment in these programs is how California closes the housing gap. A measure that undermines the state budget undermines housing."

  • California YIMBY
    Brian Hanlon and Noah Ornstein, CEO, Director of Industry Partnerships

    "[Prop 40] is poorly-designed: It will likely harm housing production by discouraging investment in California. It will likely harm overall tax revenues by driving out the taxpayers who already pay the most taxes. It earmarks most of the funds for a very narrow set of pre-defined uses. It is a one-time windfall tax that will not solve longer-term revenue problems, and would exacerbate them by creating future shortfalls."

  • California Housing Consortium
    Ray Pearl, Executive Director

    "California policymakers have struggled for decades with the state’s volatile revenue system, [Prop 40] only compounds the volatility, adding uncertainty to both the economy and state budget, while narrowly dictating how these resources can be spent. Affordable housing providers believe there are better, more effective ways to fund the wide range of public services Californians depend on."

  • Community Housing Opportunity Corporation
  • California Apartment Association

Veterans Groups

  • California Association of County Veteran Service Officers
  • California State Commanders Veterans Council
  • Marine Corps League, Department of California
  • Marine Corps Veterans Association
  • Reserve Organization of America – Department of the Golden West
  • Scottish American Military Society, Post 1921
  • Veterans Affiliated Council
  • Military Officers Association of America, California Council of Chapters

Family Farmers

  • California Farm Bureau Federation
  • Western Growers Association
  • Monterey County Farm Bureau
  • Sonoma County Farm Bureau
  • Butte County Farm Bureau

Business & Taxpayers

  • California Society of Certified Public Accountants
    California Society of Certified Public Accountants

    "CalCPA opposes the measure because it creates a fundamentally new and difficult-to-administer tax framework that raises significant administrative feasibility concerns."

  • California Chamber of Commerce
    California Chamber of Commerce

    "The effort to impose an unprecedented wealth tax is not only misguided but creates a dangerous precedent that will cause more problems than it would ever solve. The risky nature of taxing unrealized gains on shares held by founders of Silicon Valley simply to obtain a one-time infusion of tax revenue that ignores the state’s systemic budget problems. One recent analysis found the exodus of wealthy Californians, along with the resulting trickle-down of those decisions to leave, could shrink government tax revenues by as much as $4.5 billion."

  • California Hispanic Chambers of Commerce
  • California Asian Pacific Chamber of Commerce
  • California African American Chamber of Commerce
  • California Black Chamber of Commerce
  • Greater Los Angeles African American Chamber of Commerce
  • Hispanic Chambers of Commerce of San Francisco
  • Southern California Black Chamber of Commerce
  • Bay Area Council
    Libby Schaaf, President & CEO

    "We all want a California that is more affordable, more equitable, and more prosperous. But we cannot tax our way to those goals by discouraging the investment and innovation that fuel economic growth. The path forward is creating more housing, improving education, and expanding economic opportunity—not imposing a wealth tax that risks shrinking the resources available to support those priorities. [Prop 40] would move California in the wrong direction."

  • California Multicultural Business Alliance
  • Latin Business Association
  • California Taxpayers Association
  • California Taxpayers Protection Committee
  • Placer County Taxpayers Association
  • California Business Roundtable
  • Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Association
  • South Bay Association of Chambers of Commerce
  • Beverly Hills Chamber of Commerce
  • Carlsbad Chamber of Commerce
  • Carson Chamber of Commerce
  • Central Valley Business Federation
  • Chino Valley Chamber of Commerce
  • Garden Grove Chamber of Commerce
  • Greater San Fernando Valley Chamber of Commerce
  • Greater Stockton Chamber of Commerce
  • LAX Coastal Chamber of Commerce
  • Los Angeles Business Federation (LA BizFed)
  • Long Beach Area Chamber of Commerce
  • Redondo Beach Chamber of Commerce
  • Roseville Chamber of Commerce
  • San Juan Capistrano Chamber of Commerce
  • San Diego County Taxpayers Association
  • Santa Ana Chamber of Commerce
  • Santa Clarita Chamber of Commerce
  • Torrance Area Chamber of Commerce
  • Valley Industry & Commerce Association
  • Westside Council of Chambers of Commerce
  • Yuba-Sutter Chamber of Commerce

Education Associations

  • California Teachers Association
    California Teachers Association

    "After thorough review and democratic debate about [Prop 40], our State Council of Delegates – 800 educator representatives from throughout the state – determined that this policy will not provide the sustainable and long-lasting funding that our schools and communities deserve."

  • California School Boards Association
    Vernon M. Billy, CEO & Executive Director

    "[Prop 40] raises serious questions about revenue reliability, economic impacts and the long-term consequences for California's tax base. CSBA believes students are best served through durable funding solutions that strengthen educational opportunity while preserving the state's economic competitiveness."

  • Association of California School Administrators
    Dr. Rene Rickard, President

    "California’s students and schools have too much to lose under Proposition 40. The measure guarantees schools none of its revenue, places those dollars outside California’s longstanding constitutional protections for education and threatens the ongoing funding classrooms depend on. ACSA opposes Proposition 40 because students deserve resources they can count on, not a measure that will leave them with less."

Civil Rights and Social Justice Organizations

  • Equality California
    Tony Hoang, Executive Director

    "California needs sustainable, predictable funding to address the challenges facing LGBTQ+ people. We need ongoing solutions to fund health care, education, and other critical services that LGBTQ+ Californians rely on, not one-time fixes."

  • NAACP California/Hawaii State Conference
    Dr. Rick L. Callender, Esq., President

    "Proposition 40 is the wrong way to address the challenges facing our state. In fact, it will make many of our problems worse, diverting billions of dollars from public schools and putting additional pressure on the budget that could squeeze funding for other essential public services. That’s why we urge Californians to vote No on Proposition 40."

  • National Action Network Sacramento
  • Citizens for Accountable Leadership
    Chair Rickey Ivie, Esq. and Chair Emeritus Dr. Gail Willis

    "All of our communities in California deserve to thrive, but instead, Prop. 40 leaves too many behind. It’s missing key safeguards to ensure funds are spent as promised and it does nothing to address our growing housing, higher education, environmental, and infrastructure needs. We urge Californians to vote No on 40."

  • Familias Unidas
  • Community Build, Inc.
  • Westside Action Group

Building & Trade Unions

  • State Building & Construction Trades Council of California
    Chris Hannan, President

    "[Prop 40] will drive away capital when we need it the most, threatening construction jobs, our infrastructure, and California's future. When investment leaves California, critical housing, transportation, school, and water projects leave with it. We can't let that happen."

  • International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 11
  • California State Council of Laborers
    Joseph Cruz, Executive Director

    "We should be doing everything we can to encourage new investment and job creation across California, not driving it away. The California State Council of Laborers and our 80,000 union construction workers are proud to join the state’s union teachers, firefighters, carpenters, home care and family child care providers, and so many others all saying NO on 40."

  • District Council of Ironworkers of California and Vicinity
  • United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America
    Pete Rodriguez, Vice-President

    "California’s working people need more jobs, more investment, and more opportunities — not policies that make it harder to build and grow. This initiative will discourage investment, slow economic activity, and threaten the jobs, wages, and benefits that support union families. We believe in a fair tax structure, but this proposal misses the mark."

  • California-Nevada Conference of the Operating Engineers
    Matthew Cremins, Director

    "Our members build the infrastructure that powers California’s world-leading economy – from bridges, dams, and roads to rail lines, airports, and other critical projects. Our future and these union jobs depend on sustaining and growing this work, not sabotaging it with this deeply flawed wealth tax experiment. Together, our union brothers and sisters urge Californians to vote NO on 40."

  • International Union of Elevator Constructors Local 8
  • Communications Workers of America District 9

Public Safety Leaders

  • California Professional Firefighters
    Darrell Roberts, President

    "[We] stand firmly against Proposition 40 because when you gamble with the finances of our state and local governments, you gamble with public safety. Given California’s mounting fire danger and ongoing fiscal challenges, we need smart, durable solutions, not unproven risks. That’s why our 38,000 professional firefighters and emergency medical service personnel are proud to stand with teachers, the building trades, health care providers, and other sworn public safety professionals to say NO on 40."

  • California State Sheriffs’ Association
  • California Police Chiefs Association
    Sean Thuilliez, President

    "California should not address today’s issues by risking tomorrow’s safety and security. Proposition 40 threatens the long-term funding that supports public safety and other essential services. California’s police chiefs urge voters to reject Proposition 40."

  • Peace Officers Research Association of California
    Brian R. Marvel, President

    "As the state’s largest law enforcement organization, our members know that safer streets require sustained investment. By further destabilizing California’s finances, this scheme is not just reckless — it’s dangerous."

Elected & Public Officials

  • Governor Gavin Newsom
    Gavin Newsom

    "[Prop 40] does not support our public educators. It does not support our teachers and counselors, our librarians. It doesn’t support our first responders and firefighters. It doesn’t support the general fund and parks."

  • Fmr. HHS Secretary Xavier Becerra (D – Gubernatorial Candidate)
    Xavier Becerra, Former U.S. HHS Secretary & Democratic Candidate for Governor

    “You don’t need tax policy to be a one-time shot because you need consistent, predictable revenue in order to manage a budget the size of the state of California…I was for 20 years on the Ways and Means Committee in Congress — a tax policy writer. Tax policy has to be predictable, it has to be stable, and it has to understand that it’s interconnected with everything that goes on.” (March 11, 2026)

  • Small Business Owner Steve Hilton (R – Gubernatorial Candidate)
  • U.S. Representative Sam Liccardo
  • Fmr. U.S. Representative Katie Porter
  • State Treasurer Fiona Ma
  • State Senator Josh Becker
  • State Senator Christopher Cabaldon
  • State Senator Henry Stern
  • State Senator Tom Umberg
  • Assemblymember Patrick Ahrens
  • Assemblymember David Alvarez
  • Assemblymember Anamarie Ávila Farías
  • Assemblymember Marc Berman
  • Assemblymember Lisa Calderon
  • Assemblymember Mike Gipson
  • Assemblymember John Harabedian
  • Assemblymember Gregg Hart
  • Assemblymember Jacqui Irwin
  • Assemblymember Corey A. Jackson
  • Assemblymember Stephanie Nguyen
  • Assemblymember Blanca Pacheco
  • Assemblymember Sharon Quirk-Silva
  • Assemblymember Michelle Rodriguez
  • Assemblymember Blanca E. Rubio
  • Assemblymember Catherine Stefani
  • Fmr. Assembly Speaker Antonio Villaraigosa
  • Fmr. Assemblymember Ian Calderon
  • Mayor Daniel Lurie, City of San Francisco
  • Mayor Matt Mahan, City of San Jose
  • State Chief Service Officer Josh Fryday